I Got My EM training during 'Prime Time'....

In the article "Young Doctors Learn Bad Habits From TV Medical Dramas", in the NATIONAL POST, (Mar 23, 2009) author Tom Blackwell talks about how more and more young physicians are becoming a product of the entertainment industry rather than the medical education establishment.The original article published in the "Journal of Resuscitation" looked at data gathered by a survey in which evaluation of young MDs (YMD) ability to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI) was influenced by television medical dramas.

When YMDs were asked where they "learned" their skills (when they were noted to have performed them incorrectly) some responded by indicating that they saw it "on TV". Further information showed that the most often cited TV medical drama for this was NBC TV's "ER".

Researchers then backtracked to investigate this more and find out just how mis-leading some TV medical dramas are.


The researchers (Dr Brindley and Needham) looked at an entire season of ER episodes. They specifically looked at scenes depicting ETI; and more specifically, ones where they could clearly see the entire procedure to critique it.

Their research showed that 22 observed ETIs that met criteria, had at least one step done incorrectly.

INTERESTING SIDE NOTE:
There were 22 ETIs that met criteria, I can only assume that some did not; but they do not say how many were excluded. A typical North American TV "season" averages from 22-26 episodes. This means that on the average, nearly one person received ETI each episode! Unfortunately, without data from the other seasons of ER, it's hard to compare if this particular season had more or less ETIs than their "season-average" (???)

The researchers went on to explain that "traditionally" topics such as ETI are taught in a lecture-classroom setting first, and then reinforced in the clinical (IE: hands on) setting. So when those YMDs attributed their performance failures, it is interesting to note that they recalled their more influential experience watching ETI to have come from the TV medical dramas.

So why the disparity? Why did some of the YMDs remember their ETI "training" more from the TV rather than their didactic and practical instruction? Is there something different the establishment needs to do to drive home the education and experience? Is there something to be learned from TV medical dramas?

When we look at what is "entertainment" things like: story line, special effects, continuity, contemporary issues, hi-profile actors/actresses and plot intrigue factor into play. If you look at NBC TV's successful ER drama, it is no wonder that it was successful. This was an adrenaline pumping, fast paced, on the seat of your pants show. ER was one of the innovators in using the first-person-continuous-scene filming style. This greatly enhanced the "realism" of the show. As well ER frequently dealt with issues of such impact and significance as: resuscitation, trauma, life-death -- it lends itself easily to a hi-powered drama.

All these factors that go into making ER a great show (as well as a much recognized and rewarded show), make it also form more of an impression on the viewer. You remember, more...You contemplate it more... You analyze and think about it more.

Now back to our traditional model of education; that dry, stuffy, formal lecture hall or classroom. Do you really think the classroom can lend itself to as much as an entertaining-learning experience as prime time TV?

Probably not.

Even if we step forward out of the lecture hall and into the clinical arena, it still fails to compare. The "real world" business of treating patients and learning by hands-on, does not compare to the pulse-pounding world of shows like ER. Although one would argue that once you apply learning to the psycho motor (IE: hands on) phase in the clinical setting, you should get higher reinforcement and retention - but apparently not.

I'm guessing that prime time medical dramas like ER, are just hard acts to follow when it comes to teaching and learning.

In the end, I think the lesson we can learn here is to look at what we (as educators) can do to make our teaching and our student's respective learning experiences more "high powered", engaging and compelling.

With our currently expanding use of life-like simulators, skills labs and technical advances - eventually we will reach a cross-roads where life meets technology. At that point we can start to see how a new "technical-altered-reality" would evolve.

I think there is something that we can take from all this, and see the future of education and how we can apply it to the learner's skill sets.


NEXT UP: Now I'm going to pick a season of ER and do my OWN study - I want to look at of all the ACLS scenarios, how they adhered to the AHA guidelines of the day!!!

"KMG-365, Clear..."